The big difference with MXF is that it can contain much more metadata information than Quicktime or Windows Media. Within that container are specific codecs like DV, WM 9, and H.264. It is a file container like Quicktime, Windows Media and MPEG-4. "MXF is a file container designed specifically for TV, film and broadcast workflow. Is there a real benefit (regarding avoiding compression) to transcode to MXF to edit T2i original files?" ![]() Is that possible or I`m making a wrong judgment (on no video quality loss)? In fact I have ignored MXF up to now.īut I made a litle test rendering some T2i files to Sony MXF (35mb/s) and noticed that, beside the rendered MXF files are much smaller than the corresponding T2i files (great!), comparing them on the preview monitor, it seems that there is no video quality loss, and editing is easy. " I use Vegas 9.e and have been transcoding my T2i files to Neoscene - big files. From another forum / thread I started some days ago:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |